Showing posts with label horror film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label horror film. Show all posts

2026-07-24

Resident Evil (2026) official trailer released

Beloved 1996 Playstation game and (somewhat) zombie movie franchise "Resident Evil" gets yet another treatment. 

Sony Pictures just dropped the full official trailer for the new "Resident Evil" 2026 reboot. It's a noisy trailer with heavy, annoying editing - but otherwise it looks actually pretty good. The movie was directed by Zach Cregger of "Barbarian" (2022) and "Weapons" (2025) fame, and it seems to be a real quality production. That's a reasonably interesting looking protagonist, the way the new story ties in with the original Resident Evil universe doesn't feel forced or blunt, there's a bit of tasteful quirky humor, some eerie first-person camera view in the dark, snowy woods, a bizarre multi-armed and multi-legged creature creeping though the empty door frame... and so on, this doesn't feel wrong at all on first contact. 

Of course it remains to be seen how well it works as a feature length film, but this is great stuff so far, check it out!

Watch "Resident Evil" (2026) trailer:

 

Sony Pictures Entertainment


2026-07-14

Review: I Lunghi Capelli Della Morte ("The Long Hair Of Death", 1964)

The year is 1499. When a woman is falsely accused of witchcraft, and burnt at the stake, her two daughters watch in horror. In her last moments, she curses the people and the land, and while her younger daughter is taken into custody of a baron with some outrageous manners, her older daughter vows to restore justice beyond the grave...

Phew. Ok, the opening section of "I Lunghi Capelli Della Morte" is quite intense, but it's still only a fraction of what the movie has to offer.  It's Anthony M. Dawson aka Antonio Margheriti, it's Barbara Steele, it's Italian, it's witches, fire, castle, revenge...!

So this is a gothic horror movie, the very iconic vintage kind, set at the end of the Middle Ages. Traditional religion and folklore serve as a background for a nicely crafted story of injustice and guilt. There's not a huge amount of intellect here, as isn't too much graphic violence, but a heartfelt dark fairy-tale about morale and decency, which ends in tragedy and redemption. The visuals basically match the content: No fancy experiments, just the usual vocabulary of brick walls, spiderwebs, candles, dark hallways, secret passages, a damsel in distress, a gentleman at her side, and so on. It's not groundbreaking, but it looks and feels just perfect, moody, spooky, dark and fateful. 

On top of all of this are some details in "I Lunghi Capelli..." that really raise it above off-the-shelf material. It starts with quite a bang, and from there, it works its way through the storyline, with some very decent acting by Ms. Steele, some exceptionally beautiful black-and-white picture composition (The cross and the ashes... whoa!), some amazingly dynamic camera sweeps and fluent editing, some scares and some suspense, to a bone-chillingly grim conclusion.

Especially the ending section is so dark, and so beautifully directed and filmed, it is the most obvious sign that actual thought and passion went into the production of the movie. Someone really cared for this, and it pays off. "I Lunghi Capelli..." has some lengths here and there, and, obviously, it's not meant to start endless debates about human existence (or... maybe?) (no, probably not), but even in its weakest moments it's still good enough to nicely carry on, and in its best moments it's pretty spectacular and scary.

It's one of those movies that completely delivers on its promise, easily as much as Mario Bava's even more iconic "La Maschera Del Demonio" ("Black Sunday", 1960). You want gothic? Fasten your seatbelt, "I Lunghi Capelli Della Morte" doesn't waste much time - it almost literally throws you directly into the hell of a burning at the stake!

Verdict: Dark and beautiful - as solid as a 500-year-old castle! 6.5/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058307

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Hair_of_Death

> Watch the full movie for free in "Streaming Kino"...

Trailer video:

 
 
* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.

 

 

2026-06-13

Re-re-remake: Night Of The Living Dead (2026) trailer

Yet another re-something of George A. Romero's genre-defining original modern zombie nightmare.

Wikipedia lists 10 re-somethings of the original 1968 movie, and IMDB has about 15 entries. 2026 brings us yet another one, which, to be very precise, is titled "Based On The Original Night Of The Living Dead" (according to IMBD), or maybe even more accurately "Based On The Original Film Night Of The Living Dead" (according to the movie poster / cover artwork). 

All of this doesn't exactly scream "quality!" in your face, but we shall give it a chance, and a new zombie movie with some Romero-esque influence is always welcome.

The full movie hasn't been released yet, but a trailer popped up about two months ago, giving us a little preview.

It's not overwhelming, probably in part due to the many previous (re-)adaptations of the material, which certainly had an inflationary effect on the legendary title, and the impact associated with it. Also there are some moments in the trailer that just look unconvincing. The original film was a low-cost production, as are many good horror (zombie) movies, so we don't complain about cheap special-effects - it remains to be seen how well (?) they work in the context of the full movie.

But something stands out about this latest "Night Of The Living Dead": There is an honest attempt here to give it actual character. Visually, it cites the 1968 film almost verbatim in some regards (e.g. Barbara looks like actual Barbara), but obviously updates it to more modern times in other regards, creating a somewhat unusual look & feel that might rise some 1960s-cult-movie-nerds' eyebrows. There might be some potential here. 

Anyway. While waiting for the movie, we can watch the trailer. What do you think, does this get you interested, maybe excited?

Watch "(Based On The Original) (Film) Night Of The Living Dead" (2026) trailer:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZw-7qdFJe8

*

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt33296064/



2026-01-14

Review: Il Boia Scarlatto ("The Crimson Executioner", 1965, Massimo Pupillo)

A team of photographers and models moves to an abandoned castle, to do a photo shooting for a horror novel. It turns out the castle is still inhabited, and the owner doesn't like his guests to roam around the catacombs. The long presumed dead Crimson Executioner returns to restore the rules of the house...

This is a review of the original Italian release of the movie with a runtime of ~87 minutes.

"The Crimson Executioner", also known as "Bloody Pit Of Horror" (in its shorter form), is a beautifully cheap and blunt Italian gothic horror movie. If you've ever seen some pages of legendary photonovel "Killing" (aka "Satanik" aka "Sadistik"), which happened to be first published roughly at the same time as "The Crimson Executioner", you have a good idea what to expect from this film.

Only in motion, and in color. In a nice medieval castle setting, with lots of beautiful women, and some pretty good looking men, we get an array of hardly very suspenseful situations, but the striking simplicity of it all is what makes it so enjoyable. There's little nuance in "The Crimson Executioner", everything notable happens center screen, in full lighting, with limited ambience. The visual finesse is roughly that of a porn movie, and it's the complete lack of artistic ambiguity that creates some powerful moments. This is most obvious is the color palette: Red, black, and white are very prominently used, giving the film an eye-popping high-contrast aesthetic that has a certain effect even if you're seeing only a still picture.

Add to that the shiny, artificial quality of 1960s movie make-up and fake blood, a little bit of wooden acting and action, some weirdly erotic (?) music that doesn't scare anyone, and the quite impressive selection of torture devices, and you get a nice, saucy fumetto nero, an Italian horror comic for adults.

It's not really an exciting movie - you probably wanna keep your remote control nearby, and maybe fast-forward a little, here and there. It's not really gory - if you're a gorehound, you will be disappointed. In fact, if you're looking for what is commonly known as a "good movie", then maybe just skip "The Crimson Executioner".

But if you're into 60s grindhouse, have a weak spot for horror comics (photonovels), and just enjoy watching reasonably bizarre movies, then this might be a gem for you - they sure don't make 'em like this anymore!

Verdict: Nice low-budget outrageousness for the connoisseur. 5/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058983/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Pit_of_Horror

Trailer video:

 

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.



2025-12-29

Streaming Kino: I Lunghi Capelli Della Morte ("The Long Hair Of Death", 1964) - Antonio Margheriti, Barbara Steele

Barbara Steele stars in Antonio Margheriti aka Anthony M. Dawson's creepy and beautiful gothic horror movie about witchcraft, guilt, and revenge.

Italian black-and-white horror at its best. Darkness, candles, scary stairways, catacombs, coffins...! With some fantastic imagery and a tragic story that leads to a spectacular, bitter end, it's a must watch for fans of vintage gothic horror films.

> Read full review...

Watch "The Long Hair Of Death" (1964):

video source:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-Hu7yfHFG8

* * *

More information about "The Long Hair Of Death" (1964):

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058307

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Hair_of_Death

* * *

Click here for all "Streaming-Kino" films/articles.

 

 

2025-12-07

Review: Ceremonia Sangrienta ("The Legend of Blood Castle", 1973, Jorge Grau)

The Marchioness Bathory, a descendant of the legendary, cruel Countess Bathory of late 16th century Hungary, is struggling with her age and loneliness, while on the outside the villagers are kept on their toes by what appears to be vampirism killing the people. She develops ideas similar to those of her infamous ancestor, and soon some local girls go missing...

The blood runs in rivers in "Ceremonia Sangrienta", and justice will be spoken, thoroughly.

"The Legend of Blood Castle" aka "Blood Ceremony" (which is the literal translation of the original Spanish title) is a very loose variation of the actual historical story of Countess Bathory, who presumably killed a lot of young women. It's a low-, or, given the context, maybe mid-budget gothic horror movie with a fictional story that plays out a bit like a historical drama.

Director Jorge Grau, who would later go on to create great zombie-flick "The Living Dead At Manchester Morgue" (1974), really shows what he's capable of in this movie. From the time frame and content, one might expect a more flashy movie on first sight, like most Italian gothic horror movies are, but "Ceremonia Sangrienta" is a tad more moderate in pacing, and remarkably precise in direction and editing. It is flashy, but equal attention has been given to telling the story in a serious and tasteful way. 

Tasteful, of course, might be a bit of a stretch for the "normal" viewer - there's plenty of gore, cruelty, corpses, and nudity. And it doesn't fall flat on its face. Not only is the exploitative element more or less effective for what it is, but it's also carried by the movie's very convincing storytelling, serious acting, and some amazing finesse in editing and composition that shows up here and there. 

There is a particularly nice sequence, in which one of the victims appears in a nightmarish vision, that is lighted, edited and acted to perfection, and gives you the creeps. Did "Ceremonia Sangrienta" anticipate bits from "The Exorcist" (1973) and "It's Alive" (1974) here?

Also nice, and oftentimes a part of Spanish films, are strong female characters. It isn't as obvious as in, let's say "Death Walks On High Heels" (1971), but there are plenty of moments in "Ceremonia Sangrienta" where a female character is less two-dimensional than expected from such a kind of movie, with some nice dialogue or acting. Especially Lucia Bose, playing the lead role, gives a great, sometimes genuinely captivating performance.

The horror in "Ceremonia Sangrienta" doesn't 100% come from the dark shadows, hidden passages and cobwebs, so it might not be 100% "gothic horror" in a cinematic sense. But it's still gothic enough to satisfy in that regard, and it adds some giallo moments alongside the (fictional) "history horror".

The end result is a nice shocker, with some weaker moments, but far more brilliant ones. The devil, they say, is in the detail. In this case, the art is in the detail. "Ceremonia Sangrienta" is basically just low-cost default material - used pretty much to perfection. Money doesn't make good movies. Good work does.

Verdict: Wow, it's very solid! 7/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068352/

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonia_sangrienta (spanish)

Trailer video:

 

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.

 

 

 

 

 

2025-10-29

Review: Blood Sucking Freaks (1976, Joel M. Reed)

Master Sardu runs a very questionable theater, in which acts of torture are re-enacted on stage. Critics doubt his artistic intentions and achievement - and indeed the show isn't quite what it claims to be...

Oh my. We are kidding, aren't we? Well, ultimately, the answer just has to be yes, we are kidding - but first let's get a couple of things straight.

"Blood Sucking Freaks" is a cheap and very nasty little oldskool splatter movie from the 1970s. It's outrageously tasteless, sleazy, and gory. It easily rivals Jess Franco's mediocre (=bad) movies, maybe even his bad (=unwatchable) ones. But with much more gore. It makes no attempts at gritty realism, it's a reasonably proper low-budget movie, but what is visually going on looks more like an amateur school play with cheap prosthetics. There is a bit of a story in it, but about 90% of the screen time are devoted to little, hardly elaborate, build ups to, and depictions of, some sort of physical (gory) torture. When you're done watching the movie, you kind of wonder: Why the effort? Why the violence? What was this?

So, very clearly, "Blood Sucking Freaks" will offend a lot of people, in fact everyone, including horror film geeks. There's less storytelling in it than in a Herschell Gordon Lewis splatter movie, but the level of depravity is easily on par with "Two Thousand Maniacs!" (1964), if not higher. It has no strong character moments, no notable rhythm, neither in dialogue nor in structure, and the gore scenes pretty much neutralize each other, it's a more or less indifferent row of scenes with talking, and cutting limbs. (Yeah, it's gory.)

Having said all of this, one has to admit: It's hilarious. Some people had a lot of fun making this. It's really like children's play, only by and for hardly grown up grown-ups. It's so blunt and crude, and there's even a little hint at some self-aware subtext in there, that one can't deny it says... something. In fact, with some good-will effort, one could say it has moments where it makes a pretty good point about what it actually is, both in form and in content. An idea similar to the background of "Cannibal Holocaust" (1980), or "Natural Born Killers" (1994) - but waaaaaay (!) more simplistic and crude. So, there might be even a certain cathartic quality to "Blood Sucking Freaks", in one way or another, but it's highly questionable if this was the director's intention, and it's certainly anything but nuanced or subtle about it. (Definitely gory.) 

Well. What can you say. Obviously, this movie is not to be taken verbatim. It has a hint of atmosphere, it has a hint of charm, and a hint at a message - but it's nowhere near what is commonly known as a "good movie", regardless of budget. It's blunt, bad, nasty grindhouse(-basement), very-low-budget filmmaking for desensitized oldskool gorehounds. If you like that kind of stuff, you get the full package. The average audience will probably just vomit, not only because of the amount of gore, but also because it feels cheap, base and pointless.

It is up to the viewer to find out if watching "Blood Sucking Freaks" might turn out to be a funny or cathartic experience - but one thing is for sure: by common standards, in every regard, you most likely don't want to.

Verdict: It's sick. Whatever that may mean to you. 4/10  

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077247/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_Sucking_Freaks

Trailer Video:

Sorry, no trailer video. It's a little too much, it might brake blog provider's rules.

But you can find it on the IMDB page, and here:
https://archive.org/details/TRAILERBLOODSUCKINGFREAKS

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.



2025-08-02

Review: Emanuelle E Gli Ultimi Cannibali ("Emanuelle And The Last Cannibals", 1977, Joe D'Amato)

A bizarre incident at a hospital yields a link to a forgotten cannibalistic tribe of the Amazonian rainforest. Accompanied by a small team, investigative reporter Emanuelle tries to find the tribe and get a sensational story. It turns out not all members of the team share the same goals, and the law of the jungle is harsh, claiming many victims in cruel ways...

Director Joe D'Amato is sometimes hailed as the King of Sleaze. (Black) Emanuelle is the hottest journalist around, she's well known for her hard-boiled work ethic, and this time she meets cannibals in the jungle. Quite obviously, this movie is not for the kids, it's for adults, a half-erotic, half-horror production from the heyday of Italian exploitation cinema.

Before Emanuelle finds any cannibals, the movie shows us huge amounts of both male and female skin (pretty much every part of the body) in a seemingly endless row of medium-core erotic scenes. This might, or might not, be enjoyable for the viewer, but it's certainly expected from an Emanuelle movie, especially the Italian kind. If you like some vintage erotics, then it's probably a reasonably nice watch, but the amount of screentime is way beyond anything suitable for an adventure story.

In between all the nudity, we get little pieces of the story, and almost precisely at about half the runtime of the film, it takes a turn from erotics-heavy to hard adventure. The change in pacing is dramatic, and it becomes obvious that there's a real effort to make it a flashy, exciting deep jungle movie, complete with quicksand, nasty traps, hidden treasure, etc. Emanuelle and her team are trying to find their way through the wilderness in the usual manner, as seen in pretty much every such production, the animals are dangerous, the cannibals are deadly, ...

The material is great: The story has mystery, adventure, and cannibals, Laura Gemser's iconic, exotic looks perfectly round off the visual appearance of our jungle expedition team, the violence and gore scenes are sometimes gnarly, sometimes blunt, and certainly enough to provide noticeable shock value, there are a handful of nice zooms and edits adding a bit of an artificial touch, the film stock (mostly) looks great, fully saturated with a moody color grading (albeit quite dark in some scenes), the little ending "twist" nicely underlines Emanuelle's irresistible beauty and gives it a hint at the surreal - the design and atmosphere of "Emanuelle E Gli Ultimi Cannibali" is remarkably, and amazingly close to an actual fumetto per adulti come alive, both in aesthetics and in content, you can almost see the comic strip panels and feel the pulp magazine paper. If only...

Yeah, if only it was the entire movie. Before we can submerge ourselves in the primary-colored world of a good old horror comic, we have to sit through endless love scenes. A little bit of erotics doesn't hurt, and it's a classic ingredient of Italian pulp fiction, but in this case it's almost two separate movies in one. Maybe this sounds attractive for some viewers, but it just breaks the idea of both a satisfying erotic feature film, and a horror one. In fact, this split-theme movie format was used a couple more times, but it obviously wasn't successful.

"Emanuelle E Gli Ultimi Cannibali" is a bit of a wasted opportunity. If Joe D'Amato had devoted more of the runtime to telling the adventure story, this could've been among the top five oldskool jungle cannibal movies. Not as serious as "Ultimo Mondo Cannibale" (1977), not as disturbing as "Cannibal Holocaust" (1980) - but as a nasty, juicy comic strip that checks all the boxes with flying colors.

But, roughly speaking, it's just a ~45 minute movie that most people probably want to skip - and another one, that's actually pretty entertaining, if you like vintage cannibal horror. It still has some erotic scenes, but just the right amount to not bring everything else to a halt, and otherwise it's moving forward really quite steadily.

"Emanuelle E Gli Ultimi Cannibali" could've been a real classic, but as it is, it's a heavily mixed bag with basically two ingredients that don't necessarily mix too well. Or, that just aren't mixed well. What a pity. But if you can make it through a lot of skin-on-skin activity, you're rewarded with a nice little jungle shocker.

Verdict: Both a hit and a miss, if you like. The hit is good! 5/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075984/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuelle_and_the_Last_Cannibals

Trailer video:

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.

 

2025-05-04

Review: Demoni ("Demons", 1985, Lamberto Bava)

The lines between cinema and reality blur, when a mask is found that carries evil. A movie theater becomes the battleground for hordes of bloodthirsty demons invading our world!

It's a mess. It's all over the place. A helicopter. (You'll understand.) We love it so much. 

"Demoni" drops all ballast, plays no games, and goes straight for the marbles. Which, in this case, are the games. It's not about uncovering and dissecting your innermost fears - or, only if they are an unhinged, feverish, surreal, and gory nightmare, that comes at you like a train at full steam. Where in other movies the aforementioned "marbles" would correlate to the underlying suspense, the dramatic arc, or whatever emotional effect the director intends to evoke in between the peak moments, in "Demoni" there is no such thing as an "in between". When the spectacle begins, it gets wilder and wilder, and pretty much doesn't stop until the end. 

The film-in-the-film concept mixes with some colorful outside world shots, there's plenty of action and gore, a bit of sleaze and bad lifestyle. And there's a notable lack of meaningful dialogue sequences, exposé, backstory, etc. - in "Demoni" it's all about the sonic and visual impact. The heavy metal music by Saxon, Accept, and others, used in the soundtrack, might seem a little off on first sight, but it's actually somehow accurate to the pacing of the movie, and also the stereotype that heavy metal music is inherently the devil's work. 

All of this hints at a message, a loophole in which "Demoni" is the very evil that it portrays, spilling over into the real world. But that's certainly a massive over-analysis. First and foremost, "Demoni" is a mash-up of countless themes from Italian horror cinema and fumetti (comics). Gothic demons emerging, some zombie-esque action, a helicopter (...), a hero with shiny muscles, ... If you've ever seen a fumetto like "Dylan Dog" or "Brad Barron", you get the idea. It's a lot.

And it works! There is some really awesome looking use of light and shadow, inventive and bizarre imagery, wild, scary make-up, some epic scenes of demonic onslaught, huge amounts of violence and gore, and so on, and it has a fast pace, so you don't spend much time thinking about all the insanity.

"Demoni" is one of the most spectacular productions of 70s and 80s Italian horror cinema. Does it make sense, or even educate you? No! Beware! Does it keep you tied to the screen, asking for more? Oh yeah, big time!

Verdict: All hell breaks loose in "Demoni"! 8/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089013/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demons_(1985_film) 

Trailer video:

 

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.

2025-04-02

Streaming Kino: Quien puede matar a un nino? ("Who can kill a child?", 1976)

Don't even think about it. Or would you like to imagine how to kill a child?

That doesn't sound like a very pleasant idea. Thankfully, "Quien puede matar a un nino?" examines the subject only on a superficial level - otherwise it would probably be unwatchable. But that certainly doesn't mean it's a boring movie. Quite the opposite, in fact. It's creepy, scary, a little surreal, and still easily provocative enough to make you choke here and there. Unique, awesome horror classic from Spain!

Read full review...

Watch "Who can kill a child?" (1976):

video source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtaEqW-vrqc

* * *

More information about "Who can kill a child?" (1976):
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075462/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Can_Kill_a_Child%3F

* * *

Click here for all "Streaming-Kino" films/articles.

 

2025-12-07: new video source (spanish, age-restricted)

2025-03-19

Streaming Kino: Shock Waves (1977)

Ken Wiederhorn's super chilling Nazi zombie classic, featuring Brooke Adams in a major, and the legendary Peter Cushing in a minor role.

Very creepy 1977 movie "Shock Waves" wasn't the biggest success on initial release, but has since become a cult classic, and quite rightfully so. It's grindhouse cinema at its best. Exploitative, speculative, low-budget, gritty, bleak. The focus is less on the big action, but more on the nightmarish, claustrophobic situation of being trapped on a island, desperately trying to escape inevitable doom. 

As you can see in the preview picture, the undead Nazi soldiers look amazingly ghoulish. "Shock Waves" has a unique atmosphere, and is probably best watched late at night. If possible, the night before you take a boat trip to an island.

Watch "Shock Waves" (1977):


video source:

* * *

More information about "Shock Waves" (1977):
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076704/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_Waves_(film)

* * *

Click here for all "Streaming Kino" films/articles

 

2026-06-14: video source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r919pHIAPLE (CiNENET Deutschland) vanished, replaced with english version
2025-05-07: video source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jfbvd-Nhkao (FFFPlus) vanished, replaced with german version

2025-03-13

Review: Amityville II: The Possession (1982, Damiano Damiani)

The Montellis move into an old house that soon shows scary signs of the supernatural. Or is it just the anger and fear of its new inhabitants?

"Amityville II: The Possession", based on the book "Murder in Amityville" (1979) by Hans Holzer, gives us a little bit of insight into the origins of "The Amityville Horror" (1979). Evil spirits have taken hold of the old mansion, but it's a bit of a guessing game where they actually come from. The Montelli family isn't your perfect TV family, esp. the dad is a deeply tormented person. Everything spirals increasingly out of control, and both visually and aurally the movie takes the viewer on quite a journey.

There's a priest and some exorcism, there's gore and a little bit of slime, a gothic basement, some monstrous transformation, a bit of sleaziness... When some green and red lights show up, you can't help but think "Bava! Italy!" - and indeed, director Damiano Damiani is Italian, and has directed a lot of Italian crime movies, meaning gialli, so it's no big surprise that "Amityville II" has a somehow different feel to it than the slightly more ethereal "Amityville Horror". There are similarities to the unhinged "Patrick Still Lives" (1980), but "Amityville II" is less gory, and keeps the sleaze at far less outrageous levels.

Overall, the impression is a little more blunt than "Amityville Horror". Some of the special effects are quite obvious, the characters are a little less detailed, and "Amityville II" chooses some more visceral visuals, where its predecessor would go for more mysticism. 

Is it fun to watch? Yes, it is. Seeing Burt Young in a movie is always enjoyable, the child actors are convincing, and the rest of the cast gives a solid and passionate performance, too. Lalo Schifrin provides a great soundtrack, some scenes are creepy, some are reasonably funny, there's some interesting cinematography here and there, and the pacing of the events easily keeps you occupied. 

The examination of the dysfunctional family falls a bit flat on its face, and there's a plot-hole or two - but if you're looking for some cheap thrills, you get a nice, somehow spooky, not too profound, little haunted house flick.

Verdict: Closer to cinecitta than to Amityville. 5/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083550/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amityville_II:_The_Possession

Trailer video:


* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.


2024-12-10

"28 Years Later" (2025) trailer released!

In just a couple of hours it got more than 1 million views on YouTube: The trailer for long awaited zombie* movie sequel "28 Years Later" has been released by Sony Pictures Entertainment.

After 28 Days Later (2002), which was a big success and is regarded as one of the best modern zombie horror films, and especially after 28 Weeks Later (2007), which was a satisfying sequel, a lot of people quite naturally were imagining another episode in the series titled "28 Years Later". And, after only 23 years, here it is, set for release in June 2025.

The trailer looks quite decent. It does tap a little bit into horror movie trailer stereotypes, with some fancy editing, trying to create that supposedly "disturbing" mood that has been seen in all trailers from "Jeepers Creepers" to "Insidious" - but overall it keeps things sober and gritty, suggesting a movie experience similar to that of the previous titles in the franchise. The budget of "28 Years Later" is by far the highest of the three films, and with Ralph Fiennes there's a top-class Hollywood actor in it. But with director Danny Boyle, screen writer Alex Garland, and actor/producer Cillian Murphy, "28 Years Later" also has a good amount of DNA from the original "28 Days Later".

Yeah, this could be a great movie!

Watch "28 Years Later" (2025) trailer:

What do you think? Did you like the trailer?

*

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10548174/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/28_Years_Later

*

*) I know. It's rage, not (un)death.









2024-07-09

Review: Insidious (2010, James Wan)

When a young family moves into a new house, weird things start to happen. While the husband has a hard time believing his own eyes, his wife soon attributes the irritations to the change in accommodation. But as it turns out, it's all about the boy...

"Insidious" is a nice watch. A default-touching story of this young family, scary goings-on in a house, some dudes show up for comic relief, we get the wise old lady, etc. pp. We've seen it all before, many times, and director James Wan throws in a little bit of nu-style fancy editing here and there, it's like one big mash up of horror movie styles from the 1970s to the present day. In fact we get nice elements throughout, there are no obvious flaws, even a couple of easter-eggs for horror geeks. It adds up to a nicely paced, thrilling experience, but no new ground has been broken so far.

The profoundness of this movie is very debatable - for some, it may seem like a good idea to resort to stuff like astral traveling as a vehicle for the psychology of the story, others may find it just stupid. In that sense, "Insidious" is a bit on the "Poltergeist" side of things, that links a Native American burial ground to a... TV? In other words, it feels a bit shallow here and there.

But that's ok. All is forgiven when [SPOILER] pops up. It sits so well among all the other depictions of infernal servants, and it's so well integrated into the movie, that it becomes the driving force - and it just works. Now everything makes sense. Yeah, we are scared!

All in all, the movie lacks the depth of Friedkin's "The Exorcist", or Russell's "Altered States", which both go to great lengths explaining the cultural roots of the scares to come. But it's still a wild roller coaster ride, and a great variation of the creepy visual themes found in the folklore of many countries. "Insidious" is mostly solid, sometimes excellent - well done!

Verdict: Nice. Fiery! 7.5/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1591095/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insidious_(film)

Trailer video:

 

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.


2024-06-28

Review: Survival of the Dead (2009, George A. Romero)

The zombie outbreak has become the new normal, local communities have found ways to handle their situations. But not all is well. The fight for mere survival has turned into selection, and from there into a battle of beliefs. When the dead walk the earth - what's wrong and what's right?

It has taken the world at least 20 years to appreciate George A. Romero's "Night of the Living Dead". Today it's a celebrated milestone of cinema, and part of New York Museum of Modern Art collection. Pretty much the same goes for Romero's "Dawn of the Dead". "Day..." is slowly getting the same level of appreciation. "Land..." was a big budget production, and a box office success. "Diary..." is still mostly being ignored, but sooner or later will be recognized as another milestone. Which brings us to the relevance, or the lack thereof, of "Survival of the Dead". It was a tremendous failure at the box office, and has pretty much completely disappeared from public consciousness, except maybe as an example of a bad zombie comedy.

But is it really that bad? First of all, it's a quality low-budget production. It looks good, the cast is great, there are zombies and some ok special effects (albeit no Tom Savini here, but too much CGI), it has a good story, etc. - so in that regard we can't complain. 

Where it fails, is in its rhythm, and tone. To some degree, a sober, underacting style has always been a part of George A. Romero's directing oevre, as has been comical quirkiness in his zombie movies. But in "Survial of the Dead" it mixes in a comparable unfortunate way, lacking the strong characters and center storyline that push things forward, as are masterfully displayed especially in "Dawn of the Dead". "Survival..." seems to meander from scene to scene, without really creating a steady pace, or a definitive direction. Did Uncle Georgie just get confused while telling stories?

Maybe he did, a little bit. But there's a certain depth to "Survival of the Dead" that must be explored. George A. Romero was 69 years old when the movie got released. It's about tradition vs. enlightenment, belief vs. science, family vs. community, and it's about the older generation. At the time (and even long before), Romero's insight into human existence was miles above that of the average zombie movie viewer. "Survival of the Dead" is different - expectations are everything.

In a sense, it's like trying to impress someone with a Miss Marple movie who's just watched "Se7en". Nope, this is not your spectacular "survival of the living", fight-to-the-death situation. But that doesn't mean that Miss Marple is a bad detective. "Survival of the Dead" certainly isn't the best of Romero's movies, but it's still far more interesting than many other zombie film productions.

Somehow, the questions remains: What is it, that Romero was really after with "Survival of the Dead"? In some interview, he says something along the lines of "...and I wonder how long it'll take them to get it..." about the movie, and its critics. 

It's the new normal - which is the old one. It's the channel you tune in to on TV, it's if you go to Starbucks or prefer Black Bean, it's if you vote red or blue. It's about the old guys in the back, that fight over paper, and send others to war. It's about the "why" of things in our cultural, civil society.

Only two years after the release of "Survival of the Dead", Donald Trump would start eyeing to become president of the USA, and when he finally did, in 2017, he'd put family before qualification, and superstition before science. 

Uncle Georgie told ya. 

Verdict: Really not as bad as they say. 6/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1134854/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survival_of_the_Dead

Trailer video:

 

* * *


2023-12-11

Review: Tras el cristal ("In a glass cage", 1986, Agusti Villaronga)

A Nazi criminal tries to escape his dark past and his demons by attempting suicide. But he fails, and ends up in an iron lung, requiring constant attention and care. A young male nurse is assigned to the job, and appears to have an unexpectedly deep relation to the patient...

If there's any aspect of humanity that deserves to be characterized as "innocent", it has to be the children. The loss of that innocence is a tragedy, and oftentimes becomes the root of more tragedy to come.

"Tras el cristal" is a Spanish horror thriller that deals with childhood trauma, and, in a wider sense, with war, but in strong contrast to e.g. "Quien puede matar un nino?" goes deep into psychology, exposing the individual experience of pain.

Given the horrific premise of the story, and the meticulous execution of the film, "Tras el cristal" is genuinely hard to watch. On the surface it's a depressingly dark tale of revenge, a sinister psycho thriller that plays out to grotesque levels. But at its core is a sad, sobering truth: The trauma will be passed on. Life does not choose - it just adapts.

Visually, it's dark, and surreal. We're undoubtedly in actual horror territory. This is not a crime movie - this is about the human soul. Throughout the movie we're seeing traumatized characters. Which are portrayed by the actors, young and old, with gut-wrenching accuracy. The mere sight of a person in an iron lung might be hard to stomach for some, but "Tras el cristal" goes much, much further in its descriptions and depictions. Actually not too much is shown on screen, but enough to make you gasp, and your mind will fill in the gaps.

Is it an exploitation movie? Well, yes, it kind-of is. It's a horror movie after all, which implies simplification and provocation. And it's an effective one. In fact it's so effective, and scenes involving children are always a particularly sensitive issue, it's really not for everyone. But "Tras el cristal" is also a well-rounded, captivating production, adequate to the difficult subject in its serious tone, and undeniably carries an important message that must be universally heard and understood: Don't hurt a child.

Verdict: Dark. Very, very dark. 7/10 

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090197/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_a_Glass_Cage

Trailer video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKBupFkBY2Y

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.

2023-12-07

Review: Quien puede matar a un nino? ("Who can kill a child?", 1976, Narciso Ibanez Serrador)

A man and his pregnant wife seek ease and reclusion on an island. What they find is the island to be seemingly devoid of people - except for the children. Slowly, the couple begins to uncover the true extent of what is going on...

Spain has produced a round of outstanding horror movies - one of which certainly is this one. It's genuinely scary, and can be pretty tough to sit through, especially if you're a parent. 

Two obvious themes come to mind when trying to analyze this film: a couple facing birth of their child, and rebellion of children. A third one is hidden in plain sight: Could you actually kill a child? Under what circumstances could this even become an option? These questions alone are almost too uncomfortable to even think about, let alone seeing them applied in a movie.

That's a lot of heavy subject matter. But do not despair. "Quien puede matar a un nino?" takes the easy way out. It doesn't go into the actual psychological causes and implications of the above, or, just to a very limited degree. If it really would, it would also be a very, very long movie, and, being in the horror genre, probably just downright devastating.

What remains is an intense shocker, that decides not to answer the (partly serious) questions it asks. In that sense, it's a bit on the naive side, but in every other sense it goes all the way, and doesn't flinch away from the consequences. Technically, the acting is good to outstanding, there are a couple of epic scenes of creeping terror, the script, together with some nice editing, provides twists and reveals, music is used sparsely, but effectively, and everything is put together with a good pace, resulting in a constantly growing feeling of suspense and scare. "Quien puede matar un nino?" is a terrifying experience, that might be a little too much for some, but at its heart is inspired by the love for children, and - thankfully - is "just" a great horror film.

Verdict: Hellish. Grotesque. Brilliant. 8/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075462/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Can_Kill_a_Child%3F

Watch the full movie for free in "Streaming Kino"...

Trailer video:

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.

 

2023-08-29

Review: Häxan (1922), "Witchcraft through the ages"

Swedish masterpiece "Häxan" takes you back to the age of witchcraft like no other movie does.

If there were a film documentary of the actual appearance of the devil, and what live witchcraft is, this is what it would look like. "Häxan" is Swedish for "witch". But no, this is not like "The Witch", "The Nun", or whatever "The..."-mainstream-movie US cinema has produced. "Häxan" is very different: it's a visual history and examination of witchcraft, superstition, and the devil, in European folklore. At the time of its first release "Häxan" was the most expensive Swedish film ever, and it shows. These are images you don't forget. There is zero shock or screamers here, no fancy sound effects, no frantic action sequences, but moody music and an endless amount of atmosphere. Watching an almost 100-year old movie can be a bit creepy in itself, but watching an almost 100-year old movie about witchcraft and the devil can be downright frightening if you're in the right mood.

Of course it's impossible to rate such an old movie adequately in context of its time. Seen from a modern perspective, it is surprisingly well-rounded in terms of scientific message - albeit there's not an overwhelming amount of it - and visually genuinely stunning. It seems like a peek into the forgotten roots of pretty much all horror literature (including films). It draws from the same pool as "Suspiria", "Insidious", "The Exorcist", and all the others, but is much closer to the source. And in contrast to the aforementioned it is absolutely not shy about putting witches, demons, and... well... the actual devil in full view.

Verdict: Must-see for the enthusiast. Spooky for everyone else. 8/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013257/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A4xan

Sweden, directed by Benjamin Christensen

Trailer video (non official, see link below):

 

2023-04-18

Review: The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974, Tobe Hooper)

A couple of kids on a trip pick up a creepy hitchhiker, and get stranded at some remote farmhouse. Soon, one of the group is missing, and bit by bit the others get to know the inhabitants of the house... will they make it out?

All-time classic "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre" by Tobe Hooper is one of those 70es horror films that shaped the genre and are frequently listed among the best of their kind.

The story sounds like a pretty default low-budget slasher scheme, but the movie is an exceptionally raw, not funny, but genuinely grotesque, and coherent statement. 

It paints a picture of a society in decay, the forgotten leftovers beyond the edges of progress and TV. It has a lot of similarities to e.g. "The Hills Have Eyes" (1977), "Mothers Day" (1980), and "The Devils Rejects" (2005), but it predates all of them, and very much unlike these, there's an obvious artistic vision here that goes beyond the usual shock-and-awe tactics. 

In fact there's not much gore in "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre". Creepy, foreboding images, talk of Saturn and Zodiac, gravestones, a family devoid of any future, quick hard cuts that leave the worst to your imagination, images and sounds of pure terror - it works in your head, long after it's over. Modern civilization has created its own downfall, and as the sun sets, the apocalypse is lurking just beyond the horizon...

Verdict: Raw, brutal, and visionary. 10/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072271/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Texas_Chain_Saw_Massacre

Trailer video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKn9QIaMgtQ

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.




2022-02-01

NETFLIX's "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" 2022 (trailer)

Every once in a while a new "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" movie hits theatres. 

Here's the latest, NETFLIX's 2022 take on the subject matter, directed by David Blue Garcia, starring Sarah Yarkin, Elsie Fisher, and Mark Burnham.

Well, judging from the trailer, it certainly has style. Comic elements - as opposed to the subtle grotesqueness of the original movie - have crept into "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" since part two of the franchise, and this one is no exception. But overall it seems to get the tone and mood quite right, staying comparably close to the original in that regard.

But then this is of course just a trailer - the full movie might turn out to be quite a different experience. 

Watch "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" 2022 trailer:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcI6SFiK_yk

What do you think? Is it any good? Leave a comment below!

Additional sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Chainsaw_Massacre_(2022_film)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11755740/