Showing posts with label world war ii. Show all posts
Showing posts with label world war ii. Show all posts

2025-07-23

Review: Das Boot (1981, Wolfgang Petersen)

German WWII submarine U-96 leaves port in France, to go hunting the Allies' cargo ships in the Atlantic. The fog of war also covers the sea - not everything goes according to plan, and especially the men's return to safe harbor becomes a journey through the depths of hell itself... 

This is a review of the 1997 "director's cut" release of "Das Boot" with a runtime of ~208 minutes. The full runtime of the original TV mini-series is ~308 minutes.

If this movie doesn't get to you, you're already dead. Never before, and never after, has the claustrophobic intensity, constant near-death situation, and emotional hardship of submarine warfare been captured on film as exciting, gripping, and moving, as in "Das Boot".

Based on the book of the same name, which was written by Lothar-Guenther Buchheim, who was the actual war reporter aboard the actual U-96, the movie is a wild ride through the up and downs (actually more downs) of war duty at sea.

It's very interesting that most people agree that "Das Boot" is an extremely realistic depiction of life on a German WWII submarine - while the film actually uses a good amount of artistic freedom, and some very artistic, near-surreal imagery. One example, that was explicitly mentioned by Buchheim, is the party scene featuring two oranges. According to him, this would never have happened in reality. Another one would be the breaking bolts - in reality, in a submarine, a single cracked bolt pretty much equals instant death. There are even more obvious examples, like the fake, fixed camera view of the boat's sail (tower), and many more.

But there is still a very high degree of realism in "Das Boot", higher than in any other submarine war movie. The accurate historical setting, the on-location filming at La Rochelle submarine bunker, the perfect recreation of the inside of U-96 featuring some spectacular near-first-person camera work, the thick atmosphere, with sweaty, unshaved faces, accurate dialogue, local accents, dumb jokes, and grinding work, and much more, and maybe most of all the actual, real story, as told by an actual eyewitness. 

Many scenes in "Das Boot" are artistic, stylized, but - with just one or two exceptions - still don't feel artificial or forced, because they still accurately illustrate the reality of the movie. "Das Boot" is extremely effective in that regard. We don't know how an old sea-dog Captain-Lieutenant (KaLeun) on harsh duty actually reacts, when suddenly presented with an excessive buffet of delicacies, but having him basically say nothing perfectly underlines the grim irony of the situation. We don't know how it feels when your submarine gets hit with depth charges, but flashing figures in the dark, screaming, pain, blood, and water all over the place certainly is an adequate interpretation.

Buchheim didn't like the movie. He was the actual man, aboard the actual boat. It's impossible to recreate the actual experience of being on board U-96 - but it's possible to find an emotional, and historically and physically correct translation of what it was like. Maybe "Das Boot" has a handful of flaws in accurate physical depiction, but historically it's authentic, and it hits the bullseye in every other regard. 

"Das Boot" perfectly, and very scarily, translates the sometimes silent, sometimes ear-shattering terror of undersea war, into movie format. It's not a documentary, but an artistic, condensed look at a war submarine patrol. The degree of realism is very high, it becomes easy to suspend all disbelief that might have been left - creating a highly intense movie experience.

What stands out among the many great aspects of "Das Boot", is the acting. Not only does director Wolfgang Petersen manage to portray pretty much the entire crew of the boat, giving more focus to some, but still not losing sight of the other members. Also, thanks to the individual acting performances, we actually do care for each single one of them. There is some over-dramatization, but by far most of the time it feels like we're seeing the actual, real persons. Juergen Prochnow plays the role of his life as the KaLeun, Klaus Wennemann sends chills down your spine as the chief engineer working himself almost to death, Erwin Leder as Johann "Das Gespenst" ("the ghost") makes you hold your breath, ... the list goes on, and even musician Herbert Groenemeyer, playing the war reporter on board, gives a surprisingly convincing and moving performance.

Nice special effects, perfectly edited, an overall pacing that very nicely balances phases of calmness with phases of hefty, terrifying action, Klaus Doldinger's masterpiece sound score, with gentle tunes and variations of the epic, anthemic "Boot" theme - basically, "Das Boot" does everything right. As has been explained, it is a little bit on the over-epic side here and there - but only if you're comparing it to an actual real-time documentary. As a commercial film production, it's pretty much perfect. Realistic enough to adequately represent reality and even provide some education, artistic and dramatic to make it powerful, attractive, and digestible.

So are we rooting for the Nazis now? No, we aren't. "Das Boot" isn't about politics, it's about men, war, and death. It's immensely captivating, but also deeply saddening. It could've been a US submarine, a Japanese one, it could've been any war, at any time. Comradeship, fear, loss, and making sense of the insanity are timeless, universal themes. We are rooting for people, humanity.

Based on Lothar-Guenther Buchheim's book, Wolfgang Petersen has created the definitive submarine war movie. "Das Boot" is the mark by which all such films have been measured, for decades, and will be measured, for decades to come.

Verdict: Jawohl, Herr KaLeun! 9.5/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082096/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Boot

Trailer video:

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.

 

2025-06-14

Review: Salo, O Le 120 Giornate Di Sodoma (1975, Pier Paolo Pasolini)

In 1944, at the little Italian town of Salo, capital of the fascist, Nazi-puppet Italian Social Republic (1943 - 1945), four civil, powerful men are gathering for an event of unspeakable debauchery. With chilling calmness, they proceed through their decadent celebration - while the brutal humming of bomber planes flying above shakes the rooftops...

"Salo, O Le 120..." is a fictional tale, a loose adaptation of Marquis de Sade's The 120 Days of Sodom (1785 / 1904), set in real, historic fascist Italy near the end of World War II. It's also among the most controversial films ever made. 

On the mere surface, not too much seems to be going on in "Salo", except for some sick meeting that plays out in increasingly uncomfortable ways. But stopping there is like judging the iceberg by its tip. 

Technically, it's a flawless production. It's visually elegant, in part due to the beautiful setting in an Italian mansion, and in part due to the analytic, sometimes intrusive camera work, that uses a lot of symmetry and perfect side-shots. The acting is nuanced, precise, and highly intense at times. The dialogue is disturbing, the actions performed are even more disturbing, and the high level of realism is, yes, very disturbing.

Key to unlocking "Salo" is understanding the situation: By the end of 1943, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini was already imprisoned, and Allied forces had entered Italian main land. In the movie, a group of rich, powerful people with inherent ties to the fascist republic are celebrating their own downfall. The bomber planes are literally above them, signalling the arrival of necessary, violent change. These people have nowhere to go, they know nothing else. Starting a new life is impossible, and would also mean questioning everything that led up to this point. Unable to let go, and trapped by who they are, there's nothing left but to uphold the facade, and go on and on and on, only to be replaced by their own kind...

Director Pier Paolo Pasolini was born in 1922, lived through World War II, was openly homosexual, marxist, and a couple of other things, and became an important intellectual figure of post-war Europe - he certainly had a word or two to say about Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, and "the powers that be".

This movie was clearly born from a strong vision, and it has a message. Nothing in "Salo" is made for the quick effect, everything serves the big, sad, stomach-turning picture. The stunning quality of it, the superbly composed imagery, the cold, detached stylisation, the deliberate, delicate timing, the slow, elaborate, disturbing dialogue, the shocking dehumanisation, perversion and violence - the utter, devastating cynicism of it all just has to be obvious to the viewer, as much as the immediate visceral effect.

This isn't nazisploitation. There's no doubt it's art, and it's on the good side of history. Yes, the cruelty is taken to extreme levels, and it fits the "golden age" time frame of Italian exploitation cinema - but "Salo" really has nothing in common with films like "La Bestia In Calore" (1977) or "L'Ultima Orgia Del III Reich" (1977). Not only is it a far (!) higher quality production, but also at no point does it enjoy or endorse the horrors it portrays. It's not voyeuristic, but painfully voyeuristic. It's not obtrusive, it's consciously indiscreet, invasive. It doesn't focus on the action, but on the motivation behind it, the perpetrators, every sad, sickening moment of their fading, fey existence. "Salo" isn't about individuals or story - it's about the psyche, about tolerance and empathy, or, the lack thereof, and how this translates into a system of dominance.

"Salo" might feel just slow on first contact, but as it progresses, the moderate, sometimes drawn-out pacing takes on a sadistic tone of its own, matching the content of the film. There's no turning away, it's an ugly, painful demise with a lot of collateral damage, all while an invisible, much bigger power is looming in the air...

When "Salo" is through with you, you'll probably want (at least) a minute of silence. It wasn't made with entertainment value in mind - it's a political and humane statement. It has a flow, it is mesmerizing, and it's a real shocker, but this is actual heavy, profound stuff. If you needed a reminder why you want compassion, not dominance, empathy, not fascism, this movie is a very, very convincing one.

Pier Paolo Pasolini was abducted, tortured and killed in 1975, presumably by political far-right sympathizers. Efforts to fully solve the case are going on to the present day.

Verdict: Stunning. Numbing. 8.5/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073650/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sal%C3%B2,_or_the_120_Days_of_Sodom

Trailer video:

video source:
https://archive.org/details/salo-or-the-120-days-of-sodom-1975-trailer

 * * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.

 

2025-03-13

Review: Schindler's List (1993, Steven Spielberg)

It's 1943, Germany is a fascist country, World War II is raging, and businessman Oskar Schindler makes good profit of the situation. As the prosecution of Jews reaches his workforce, he begins to realize the humanitarian catastrophe that is going on, and his motivation turns from money to salvation.

Steven Spielberg is Jewish, and one of the best movie directors of our time. With "Schindler's List", he knows what he's talking about, and he has the skills and the means to create a movie that meets the highest standards in every regard. As a result, "Schindler's List" is a technically perfect production, and a deeply moving experience.

In it, we witness some of the numbingly atrocious practices carried out by Nazi officials and sympathisers, and the transformation of a pure businessman into an empathic, unselfish saviour. The depiction of the Nazi regime is scarily realistic, on all levels, with Ralph Fiennes giving a chilling portrayal of SS Commander Amon Göth. It goes hand in hand with the oppositional personal transformation of Oskar Schindler, played by Liam Neeson. The characterization of Schindler, a man between the lines, is handled with great care and precision. The acting in this movie is flawless, down to the last extra that has only seconds of screen time. 

Writing, lighting, set pieces, filming, editing - there's not a single frame in "Schindler's List" that feels wrong or weak. It's a visual feast in black and white, mimicking the style of 1940s cinema, but all elements of the film - successfully - serve one purpose: Tell the story. And it is a profound story that is full of horror, but also full of compassion and hope.

"Schindler's List" is a brilliant, outstanding movie. It has a bit of a flaw, though, the same way "Saving Private Ryan" (1998) has: It can't compete with reality. When millions are dying, there is no cherry picking. A historical background such as this will always be overwhelming, and putting an individual story of heroism at its center has potential to create distortion. In reality, for the vast majority of victims, there was no one there to step in and help. The situation in the movie is very bleak, but in reality, for 99.9% of those affected, it was even bleaker. If a director chooses to direct a movie about a serious, decisive historical event, his work will be, and has to be, judged in comparison to actual historic fact. Artistic freedom, even if used with great virtuosity, can be inherently inadequate.

Given the sensitive subject matter, that is inherently problematic to approach, "Schindler's List" is still, or maybe precisely therefore, an astonishing achievement.  While the movie does focus on individuals, it also manages to tie all the threads together, completing a big picture that is, in an cinematic sense, actually adequate to reality. We must not forget that it's still a dramatization, and there is a little bit of fiction in "Schindler's List" - but the end result is still so accurate, and so coherent, that there's just no point in arguing. 

"Schindler's List" is a massive success, both in terms of art and education.

Verdict: Utterly gut-wrenching, utterly beautiful. 9.5/10

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108052/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schindler%27s_List

Trailer video:

 

* * *

Want to read another movie review? Click here to see all.